Negation by Default

نویسنده

  • Teodor Przymusinski
چکیده

In this paper, we propose a new semantic framework for disjunctive logic programs by introducing the so called static expansions which extend to disjunctive programs the notions of stable, well-founded and stationary (or partial stable) models while at the same time generalizing the minimal model semantics of positive disjunctive programs. For every disjunctive program P; we de ne rst order extensions of P; called static expansions of P . Any static expansion of P provides the meaning or semantics for P by determining the set of true sentences about P . We show that among all static expansions of a disjunctive program there is always the least static expansion and we call it the static completion P of P . The static completion P is constructively de ned as a xed point of a natural minimal model operator and can be iteratively computed. The semantics de ned by the static completion P is called the static semantics of P . The static semantics always coincides with the set of sentences that are true in all static expansions of P . The class of static expansions represents a semantic framework which di ers signi cantly from the other semantics proposed recently for disjunctive programs and databases. It is also de ned for a much broader class of programs.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Well Founded Semantics for Logic Programs with Explicit Negation

The aim of this paper is to provide a semantics for general logic programs (with negation by default) extended with explicit negation, subsuming well founded semantics 22]. The Well Founded semantics for extended logic programs (WFSX) is expressible by a default theory semantics we have devised 11]. This relationship improves the cross{fertilization between logic programs and default theories, ...

متن کامل

On Strong and Default Negation in Answer-Set Program Updates

Existing semantics for answer-set program updates fall into two categories: either they consider only strong negation in heads of rules, or they primarily rely on default negation in heads of rules and optionally provide support for strong negation by means of a syntactic transformation. In this paper we pinpoint the limitations of both these approaches and argue that both types of negation sho...

متن کامل

On Strong and Default Negation in Logic Program Updates

Existing semantics for answer-set program updates fall into two categories: either they consider only strong negation in heads of rules, or they primarily rely on default negation in heads of rules and optionally provide support for strong negation by means of a syntactic transformation. In this paper we pinpoint the limitations of both these approaches and argue that both types of negation sho...

متن کامل

Embedding negation as failure into minimal knowledge

Recent studies in nonmonotonic reasoning have shown that many of the best known nonmonotonic logics are based on the same two fundamental principles, i.e. minimal knowledge and negation as failure (or negation by default). In this paper we prove that it is possible to express negation as failure in terms of minimal knowledge. Specifically, we present a polynomial, non-faithful, modular embeddin...

متن کامل

Default Conceptual Graph Rules, Atomic Negation and Tic-Tac-Toe

In this paper, we explore the expressivity of default CG rules (a CGoriented subset of Reiter’s default logics) through two applications. In the first one, we show that default CG rules provide a unifying framework for CG rules as well as polarized CGs (CGs with atomic negation). This framework allows us to study decidable subclasses of a new language mixing CG rules with atomic negation. In th...

متن کامل

On Strong and Default Negation in Logic Program Updates (Extended Version)

Existing semantics for answer-set program updates fall into two categories: either they consider only strong negation in heads of rules, or they primarily rely on default negation in heads of rules and optionally provide support for strong negation by means of a syntactic transformation. In this paper we pinpoint the limitations of both these approaches and argue that both types of negation sho...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993